[Mintwood-place] Tony Harvey's Report on the ANC1C meeting about the Admo Millionaires Hotel
John Cloud
john.cloud666 at yahoo.com
Mon Mar 12 13:35:39 EDT 2012
Adams Morgan ANC Rejects New Hotel Plan Following Earlier
Consideration by its Planning, Zoning & Transportation (PZT)
Committee
Published: March 9th, 2012
By Anthony L. Harvey
Accompanying images can be viewed in the current issue PDF
After several hours of contentious discussion by approximately 50
proponents and opponents of the proposed Adams Morgan Historic Hotel —
designed to incorporate the First Church of Christ, Scientist in an
adaptive re-use historic preservation project — the Adams Morgan
Advisory Neighborhood Commission (ANC) narrowly defeated by a tie vote
of 4 to 4 at its March 7th monthly meeting a motion by ANC Chair Wilson
Reynolds to “go on record [to the Historic Preservation Review Board] as fully supporting all appropriate action to place the First Church of
Christ, Scientist under complete District and Federal historic
[landmark] protection without prejudice to approval or denial of the
proposed hotel structure.”
The text of Reynolds’ failed resolution further asserted that the ANC found the applicants’ hotel design concept to be in “greater harmony
with the church building and represents real progress from previous
designs.” It further resolved that “the proposed materials, doors,
windows, and roof shape of the proposed design of the hotel are
sufficiently different as to provide a suitable contrast from the
presentation and character of the First Church of Christ, Scientist.”
The resolution took no position, however, on the proposed hotel
structure’s “height, density, lot occupancy or any other zoning issues”; for several commissioners, this was the resolution’s fatal flaw.
[Ed. Note: For background, see “Long-Awaited PUD Application Filed
for Controversial Luxury Hotel Tower on Champlain Street in Adams
Morgan,” The InTowner, August 2011, page 1.]
Commissioner Olivier Kamanda, for example, noted that many at the
meeting raised over and over the issue of the proposed hotel being too
high, too dense, and simply too massive for the Reed-Cooke neighborhood. Very few — almost none, in fact — talked about the bricks, doors,
windows, and roof shapes being proposed for the new structure. Why then, Kamanda asked, were the commissioners being asked to endorse these
smaller technical issues relating to a new structure’s acceptability and compatibility with an existing historic structure — the church building — while at the same time being asked to offer no comment on much larger issues such as height, density, and massing.
Commissioner Steve Lanning saw no reason for the ANC to comment on
any of these matters, observing that the HPRB would be making its
decision based on its own professional expertise and that of its
Historic Preservation Office advisors. In this he was joined by
Commissioner Marty Davis, with Commissioner Gabriela Mossi providing the fourth and tying vote to defeat the resolution. Commissioners Stacey
Moye, Adian Miller, and Kathie Boettrich joined ANC Chair Reynolds in
support of his resolution.
Prior to the ANC votes, a formal presentation to the commissioners
and the community was made by the project developers and their architect and historic preservationist, whereupon, following questions from the
commissioners, the floor was opened to questions and expressions of
community concerns from all those present who wished to speak — and for
over two hours they spoke.
Many raised issues above and beyond those on the evening’s agenda,
and draft copies of Chairman Reynolds’ proposed resolution were made
available to all attendees. Opinion was fairly evenly divided between
supporters and opponents of the hotel project, with supporters stressing their belief that the 227-room hotel with its planned five levels of
underground parking in the new structure, together with the hotel
facilities in the connecting, rehabilitated church building would bring
jobs, daytime retail traffic, and, as a couple of persons mentioned, a
“better class” of people to the existing Adams Morgan night life along
with “new standards of cleanliness” to the neighborhood.
Several people stated that the hotel would be a vital economic
mechanism to provide for the restoration and preservation of the church
building; otherwise, it was asserted, the building would be demolished
and the church would sell the site as simply a vacant lot.
Opponents of the project — as presented in its latest iteration —
stressed their concern for it being out of scale, and out of character
for the Reed Cooke neighborhood. Also criticized was that the hotel
building would be more than twice the height allowed under the existing
Reed-Cooke Zoning Overlay and therefore be totally incompatible with
zoning overlay.
Several persons also voiced their outrage that the City Council in
December 2010 voted to give the developers a $46 million tax break at a
time when the District is struggling to fund vital social service and
public safety programs.
Toward the end of the evening the presidents of the Kalorama Citizens Association (KCA) and the Reed-Cooke Neighborhood Association (RCNA)
spoke. KCA’s president noted its support for the preservation of the
Christian Science Church building “as part of a more moderately-sized
project than has been proposed” but its strong objection to the project
as proposed and for the precedent it would set affecting the relatively
low-rise stretches of Columbia Road. RCNA’s president re-affirmed its
full support for the project’s goals of increasing job opportunities and economic development and its support for the “preservation of the
church building and the concept of the hotel development on this site.”
However, the RCNA’s position is that the proposed height of the hotel,
“alleged . . . to be a minimum of not less than 90 feet is excessive.”
The result would be, in the view of the RCNA, a building that would loom over the neighborhood and not be in keeping with those on 18th Street and the interior streets of the Reed-Cooke neighborhood. Earlier, the
Lanier Citizens Association called the gathering’s attention to its
unanimous, 12-to-0, vote endorsing the project at its first and only
monthly membership meeting, which was held on October 12, 2011.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.mutualaid.org/pipermail/mintwood-place/attachments/20120312/6c7942a6/attachment.html>
More information about the Mintwood-place
mailing list