[SustainableTompkins] Building 'green' reaches a new level
Patricia Haines
ph24 at kaxy.com
Wed Aug 2 07:05:57 PDT 2006
--How does this relate to the purportedly 'green' new high-rent apartment complex just off the
Commons?
This Portland, OR story is inspiring - little by little, folks are starting to pay serious attention
- and heat waves such as this week's make the point clearer and clearer: going 'green' won't reverse
global warming, but it's the only way to a viable future
--- Original Message -----
From: GayNicholson at aol.com
To: sustainabletompkins at lists.mutualaid.org, knicholson10 at comcast.net
Sent: Wed, 2 Aug 2006 01:33:20 EDT
Subject: [SustainableTompkins] Building 'green' reaches a new level
>
>
>
> (Let's emulate this with all new development in Ithaca area.)
>
> Building 'green' reaches a new level
> Updated 7/26/2006 11:59 PM ET
>
>
> By John Ritter, USA TODAY
>
> PORTLAND, Ore. â Michelle Walsh looks out a wall of windows in her airy new
> condo high above the Willamette River. Across hills and forests loom
> snow-capped Mount Hood and, when it's clear, Mount St. Helens. Below? Construction
> chaos all around.
> Walsh revels in it. She and her husband, Edward, proudly wear "urban
> pioneer" buttons the builder handed out to early move-ins at the nation's first
> large-scale redevelopment to go 100% "green."
> Call it "eco-friendly." Call it "sustainable." Portland's $2.2 billion South
> Waterfront project, rising on a decaying industrial site south of downtown,
> signals a watershed in the green-building boom.
> A trend that has taken hold across the USA in the past few years is evolving
> to a new level. What has been a patchwork of green buildings in many cities
> is expanding to whole communities, whole neighborhoods. Portland, well known
> as an urban-design innovator, particularly for its transit-oriented
> developments, is leading the way again.
> The green ethic â energy-efficient, water-stingy buildings full of features
> that stress the natural over the chemical, the recycled over the new and the
> renewable over the finite â is firmly mainstream.
> "The big developers, the people who build America, are slow to move," says
> Charles Lockwood, an environmental and real estate consultant based in
> Southern California. "They still see a hint of tie-dye and wind chimes in green
> building. That's changing quickly. There's critical mass."
> Even in suburbia, home of large-production builders of single-family homes.
> "There's a lot more consumer interest. It's starting to be a groundswell,"
> says Calli Schmidt, a spokeswoman for the National Association of Home
> Builders in Washington. A McGraw-Hill Construction survey in March predicted that
> green building would reach a "tipping point" next year and that two-thirds of
> builders would be building green homes.
> Common features now found in green buildings include: non-toxic paint and
> finishes, wheatboard cabinetry, low-flow showerheads and toilets, wood floors
> of Brazilian cherry, Caribbean walnut and other plantation-grown varieties,
> high-efficiency heating and cooling systems, recycled and locally obtained
> building materials, rain and wastewater captured for toilets and landscaping, and
> panels that double as sunshades and solar power generators.
> The Walshes went green house hunting after they sold a home in Arlington,
> Va., that they'd owned for 30 years and came to Oregon. They bought a condo
> knowing it was temporary until the Meriwether, twin South Waterfront high-rises,
> opened. Both towers sold out during construction, except three penthouses.
> "Eco-friendly was very important to us," says Michelle Walsh, 63. "We knew
> seven years ago this project was happening, and we watched it. We wanted this
> place." The couple paid $790,000 for a 10th-floor, two-bedroom,
> three-bathroom unit with a den â plus those killer views.
> Developers and builders aren't joining the green revolution purely out of a
> sense that it's the right thing to do. They can't afford to be left behind.
> By year's end, at least 6% of the nation's non-residential construction, a $15
> billion chunk of the industry, will be green, says Greg Kats, a
> green-building consultant in Washington, D.C. Six years ago it was less than 1%.
> "If you're not embracing green, you won't be at the table," says Homer
> Williams, one of South Waterfront's developers. "We do a lot of public-private
> work around the country, and it's the first question that comes up now."
> The federal government, 15 states and 46 cities require new public buildings
> to meet the U.S. Green Building Council's LEED standards (Leadership in
> Energy and Environmental Design), which require non-toxic building materials,
> among other things.
> Four states and 17 cities offer incentives for LEED-rated private buildings.
> Chicago, Pasadena, Calif., and other cities now fast-track permit procedures
> for builders who commit to green standards.
> Raising the bar
> Developers find that green technologies and construction materials add no
> more than 1%-2% to costs, a premium quickly recaptured by energy savings.
> "Critics will say, 'Why should we pay upfront for these things?' " says
> Ethan Seltzer, director of the Toulan School of Urban Studies at Portland State
> University. "They'd also liketo believe global warming doesn't exist."
> Green building, he says, "is no longer confined to capital-intensive office
> towers. Green technology is to the point where these are valid questions for
> Home Depot shoppers."
> The Green Building Council has certified nearly 550 buildings across the
> country since 2002. Developers only recently have sought to stamp as green
> larger, multistructure projects such as South Waterfront. Same with single-family
> homes. The council is working on LEED versions for both.
> Cities interested in LEED for large ventures include Pasadena, Milwaukee,
> Austin, Des Moines, Boise and Spokane, Wash.
> Multibillion-dollar redevelopments on the Camden, N.J., waterfront and in
> New York City's Meadowlands are going green. Seattle's High Point neighborhood
> has the nation's first green public-housing project, 600 apartments and town
> houses surrounded by green houses selling at market rates. At least 5,000
> units of green low-income housing in 25 states have gone up in the past 18
> months.
> Corporate America was the first to see the value of green beyond energy
> savings.
> Companies noticed less absenteeism, less time lost to asthma, allergies and
> other illnesses aggravated by mold, stale air and chemicals found in many
> conventional buildings. But to Ford, Bank of America, Target, Toyota, Honda,
> Genzyme, Starbucks and Adobe, green also was about image.
> "In the 1980s it might have been acceptable to do a trophy building and say,
> 'Oh, look at us, we're green,' " says Rick Fedrizzi, president of the Green
> Building Council.
> No more. "The products you make should be green," he says. "The
> manufacturing process should be green. The factory should be green. Employees should work
> in a green building. You live this message all the way through and then
> someday you can call yourself a green company. Until then, it's just
> green-washing."
> The city and developers are committed to top-to-bottom green at South
> Waterfront.
> That means winning high LEED ratings on every building. It means streetcar
> and light-rail connections to downtown that cut auto travel. It means a
> mile-long, 150-foot-wide greenway between the Willamette and tall building clusters
> â not plain grass but restored natural habitat for birds and wildlife, bike
> and pedestrian paths included.
> "It sets a much higher standard than what we've seen in many cities across
> North America," says Bob Sallinger, urban conservation director at the Audubon
> Society of Portland.
> Condo and office towers will have smaller footprints to preserve views of
> the river and downtown in the neighborhood behind South Waterfront. The skinny,
> or pencil, high-rise design was pioneered on the Vancouver, British
> Columbia, skyline, and San Francisco, Sacramento, Las Vegas and other cities are
> copying it.
> "We can do a much more elegant building by making it feel very tall and very
> vertical," architect Phillip Beyl says.
> South Waterfront will be the densest neighborhood in Portland, already a
> transit-friendly city of small blocks and compact urban districts.
> Developers calculate, for instance, that if condo owners in a 31-story,
> oval-shaped tower now going up were put in single-family homes, they'd consume 55
> acres of land. South Waterfront's first phase will house 3,000 people and
> provide 5,000 jobs on 38 acres.
> Many South Waterfront streets will be narrow to invite walking and
> generously landscaped, with "bioswales" â grassy trenches that catch and absorb storm
> runoff.
> "Eco-roofs" of soil and native plants slow runoff and curb the "heat island"
> effect of sunshine beating down on conventional roofs. The skin on most
> buildings will be glazed glass to maximize energy saving and interior light.
> Finding value in 'green'
> South Waterfront's anchor, an Oregon Health & Science University bioscience
> center opening in November, is the nation's first large building to use
> chilled "beams" instead of conventional air conditioning. Picture a car radiator
> on its side on the ceiling. Chilled water passes through and cool air falls
> into the room, requiring no power to run fans or blowers.
> The university aims for the top LEED rating â platinum â which would be
> another first.
> Medical buildings that combine research labs, surgery and a lot of daily
> traffic to doctors' offices aren't easy to make green. The 16-story, $145
> million building will produce a third of its electricity and treat its own water.
> A two-story trombe â a narrow glazed-glass atrium that soaks up the sun â
> will make heat for the building's hot water. Heat pumps that use water instead
> of chemical refrigerants are costlier than standard units, but quieter.
> Therefore, the builder could spend less on soundproofing insulation.
> "Not only will they have bragging rights on the first and largest platinum
> building of its type, they'll also get a very high-performance building that
> saves money over the long haul," says Dennis Wilde, a partner in
> Gerding/Edlen, a principal developer at South Waterfront.
> Cost premiums on green building have shrunk "but were never as significant
> as people were afraid," Wilde says.
> The university's outgrown main campus atop Marquam Hill is 30 minutes by car
> for doctors traveling back and forth to the new facility. Williams suggested
> a tram to cut the ride to 3 minutes. It will open in December.
> Criticism of South Waterfront has been muted. Developers took heat when tram
> costs ballooned to $57 million from $15 million, but they say pre-design
> estimates were unrealistic. Taxpayers' share will be 15% of what some think is a
> landmark-to-be on a par with Seattle's Space Needle.
> Condos range from one-bedroom, 700-square-foot units for less than $200,000
> to two- and three-bedroom spaces for up to $1 million and a few penthouses at
> $3 million-plus.
> The buyer demographic is diverse â empty-nesters, single professionals,
> well-to-do retirees, young couples looking for urban starter homes and guys such
> as Venice Tunnitisupawong.
> An analyst at Intel west of Portland, Tunnitisupawong, 28, wanted out of the
> suburbs, even if it meant a longer commute.
> "I'm a single guy and that lifestyle doesn't really fit me right now," he
> says. He'll move into a third-floor, one-bedroom when a third tower, the John
> Ross, is finished in May.
> Early South Waterfront buyers have seen their condos spike in value already.
> Miles Morgan, a United Airlines captain, bought a one-bedroom with an alcove
> for $404,000 in December 2004, when the Meriwether was nothing but a hole in
> the ground. He estimates it's worth as much as $550,000 today.
> "This is poised to be the premier neighborhood in Portland," Morgan, 36,
> says. "It will appreciate faster than any property in Oregon or Washington."
>
> Posted 7/26/2006 11:24 PM ET
>
> ***************************************
> Gay Nicholson, Ph.D.
>
> Sustainable Tompkins
> Program Coordinator
> _www.sustainabletompkins.org_ (http://www.sustainabletompkins.org/)
>
> 607-533-7312 (home office)
> 607-279-6618 (cell)
>
> 1 Maple Avenue
> Lansing, NY 14882
> gaynicholson at aol.com
>
> Southern Tier Energy$mart Communities
> Regional Coordinator
> Cornell Cooperative Extension of Tompkins County
> 615 Willow Ave., Ithaca, NY 14850
> agn1 at cornell.edu
>
> _______________________________________________
> SustainableTompkins mailing list
> SustainableTompkins at lists.mutualaid.org
> http://lists.mutualaid.org/mailman/listinfo/sustainabletompkins
> free hosting by http://www.mutualaid.org
Level Green Institute
- fostering social, economic and environmental sustainability through collaborative initiatives in
hospitality, education and the arts
--
This email was brought to you by Kaxy Mail http://www.kaxy.com/free_email_account.htm
More information about the SustainableTompkins
mailing list