[SustainableTompkins] Fwd: [GreenYes] bio (?) plastic bag report
Thomas Shelley
tjs1 at cornell.edu
Mon May 14 20:45:22 PDT 2007
Dear Friends--As many of us have heard from various sources, the so-called
"bio-degradable" shopping bags are, for the most part, not really
bio-degradable. The following post to the Green Yes list has a lot of good
information about the truth of "bio-gradable" bags. Oh, joy.... Tom
>From: RicAnthony at aol.com
>Date: Mon, 14 May 2007 19:51:35 EDT
>Subject: [GreenYes] bio (?) plastic bag report
>To: zerowaste_sd at yahoogroups.com, crra_members at yahoogroups.com
>CC: GreenYes at googlegroups.com
>
>Brenda Platt at the Institute for Local Self-Reliance
>(<mailto:bplatt at ilsr.org>bplatt at ilsr.org) writes":
>
>Hi all,
>
>...small part deleted.... I have been focusing most of my time the last
>year on bioplastic issues and I do not support the use of biodegradable
>plastic bags for shopping bags, only for collecting organics destined for
>composting facilities. Biodegradable bags are not even close to being
>100% biobased. Further, all the biodegradable bags I know of are only
>biodegradable in commercially operated compost facilities, not for
>instance, in the marine environment.
>
>The per bag fee being proposed should apply to ALL single-use shopping
>bags in order to promote reusable bags. Let's not encourage single-use
>biodegradable plastic bags. BTW, the biodegradable petro-based
>co-polyester resin frequently used in these bags is made by the big German
>chemical giant, BASF. Let's be careful about what we are supporting.
>Also, coming down the pike is biodegradable PVC products. Just because a
>bag is biodegradable does not mean it is environmentally sound.
>
>Do we care about the impact on recycling film plastics? I'd be interested
>in a dialogue specifically on this issue. Biodegradable bags will become
>a contaminant in film recycling. I'm no fan of petro-plastics and petro
>bags. But I think this is a concern from a recycling perspective.
>
>While I am still in the process of researching biodegradable bags, here's
>some preliminary findings by bag company.
>
>First, a definition of biodegradability I wrote:
>Biodegradable plastics are plastics that can decompose into carbon
>dioxide, methane, water, inorganic compounds, or biomass via microbial
>assimilation (the enzymatic action of microorganism). To be considered
>biodegradable, this decomposition has to be measured by standardized
>tests, and take place within a specified period time, which vary according
>to the "disposal" method chosen. The American Society of Testing and
>Materials (ASTM) has created definitions on what constitutes
>biodegradability in various disposal environments. Plastics that meet
>ASTM D6400, for instance, can be certified as biodegradable and
>compostable in commercial composting facilities. In Europe the equivalent
>standardized test criteria is
><http://www.european-bioplastics.org/index.php?id=158>EN 13432. In the
>US, there is a biodegradability standard for soil (ASTM D5988), a
>biodegradability test standard for marine and fresh water (ASTM D6692 and
>D6691), one for wastewater treatment facilities (ASTM D5271), and one for
>anaerobic digestion (ASTM D 5511). Other countries have similar standards
>and certifications. Belgium is unique in offering "The OK Compost" mark,
>which guarantees that the product can be composted in home composting
>systems. While many bioplastics are indeed certifiable as compostable in
>commercial compost facilities, not all can be home composted and not all
>are biodegradable in the marine environment. Furthermore, a number of
>petrochemical-based polymers are certified biodegradable and
>compostable. Biodegradability is a directly linked to the chemical
>structure, not to the origin of the raw materials.
>
>Eco Film: No biobased content at all.
>
>Eco Works: Can contain between 5-70% corn based resin (5-70% biobased
>content, most collection bags are on the low end)
>
>Mater-bi (BioBag): Blend of petro-derived polyester and starch (the starch
>may or may not be from corn and the biobased content is around 20-30%,
>remaining 70-80% is petro-derived)
>
>Cereplast: Uses a blend of petroleum-based polyester, possibly some small
>PLA amounts and possibly other materials. Not sure about biobasd content,
>but one industry rep (not with Cereplast) told me that he believes their
>bags are "more than likely 70-100% petroleum derived." [Cereplast also
>uses nanocomposites, which I have a huge problem with. Any community
>embraces the precautionary principle should not be promoting products with
>nanoparticles.]
>
>Bio-Tuf/Heritage: Blend of polyester and calcium carbonate filler. Don't
>believe they claim any biobased content at all. Petro-derived polyester
>is likely 85% of the formulation, but don't know precise.
>
>Mater-bi (BioSak); Blend of polyester and corn-based starch. They're in
>the same range of biobased content (20-30% biobased. 70-80% petro-derived).
>
>All of the above bags are certified compostable, but none are
>petroleum-free. Nearly all are a vast majority petroleum-derived content.
>
>Best,
>
>Brenda
>
>Brenda Platt
>Institute for Local Self-Reliance
>927 15th Street, NW, 4th Fl
>Washington, DC 20005
>tel: 202-898-1610 ext. 230
>fax: 202-898-1612
><mailto:bplatt at ilsr.org>bplatt at ilsr.org
>http://www.ilsr.org
More information about the SustainableTompkins
mailing list