[Wpfw-lsb] Re: [WPFW-prog] WHY?
luzette_king at justice.com
Sat Sep 18 17:16:33 PDT 2004
I was waiting for us to talk about this as you
suggested and you didn't follow through. I wasted an
entire morning waiting for your call before I decided
to carry on with what I had to do.
Anyhow, I forgot to mention that this is something we
need to discuss tomorrow and my ideas I will share
after the meeting tomorrow. Is that satisfactory? I
hope so and ask for you patience until then.
On Sat, 18 Sep 2004 19:46:12 EDT, DcProud at aol.com wrote:
Sounds good, but is it the intention of MASC to
ignore the concerns of the LSB regarding full
participation in the interview process? What is the
new plan to allow all the elected and equal members of
the LSB to hear from the candidates? As you know, this
is probably the most important decision we will make as
a body, much more than who does or does not get
airtime? I await your ideas.
FindLaw - Free Case Law, Jobs, Library, Community
Get your FREE @JUSTICE.COM email!
More information about the Wpfw-lsb